Advertisement
 
<Forum>

Visits today:
7707
Total members:
17861
Latest member:
catkin77

Log on
Nickname
Password
Join - FREE membership
Free Membership
Chat
Members Online

168 Online
Quick Links

Training Directory
Forum
News

Bookmark this site
or press ctrl-D
Tell a friend

Advertising
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Crush Injuries - 15 minute rule challenge
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Crush Injuries - 15 minute rule challenge

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 7>
Author
PHECTA View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1254
Post Options Post Options   Quote PHECTA Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Crush Injuries - 15 minute rule challenge
    Posted: 22 Aug 2008 at 9:40pm
Unfortunately when Dave put the new server to work, it wiped the previous threads on this so i shall start again:
 
 
I would like to put the following up for debate and possibly challenge current practice (WOW WHAT A STATEMENT).
 
The first aid manuals (VAS) state "If crushed for more than 15 minutes" CAUTION "Do not release a casualty who has been crushed for more than 15 minutes"
 
I would like to see some debate around this statement.
 
As a state registered paramedic with many years experience i have attended incidents as first HCP on scene as well as backing up other HCP colleagues. On crush injuries, appart from stem the flow of blood, give pain relief (because by now the victim has been trapped for a long long time) then i wonder what other remarkable wonders we are suppose to have in an ambulance (or ambulance response car) to prevent the release of Toxins into the victims circulatory system?
 
Why then if all we seam to do is release and place the victim on a spinal board, do the VAS manuals advocate leaving a victim in agony trapped under a weight if they could release them, simply because of this 15 minute rule.
 
If a surgeon was to attend to undertake amputation of limbs on site then i could agree, but that is rare, yet we often see victims left until an ambulance arrives only for the technician in many cases to organise the release of the weight. And remember not all ambulance crews have a paramedic on these days, so come on lets challenge this and seek a change for the benefit of patients.
 
i leave this open to the floor for your debate on this subject in an adult manner and see what the outcome is (which i know wont change practice, but may raise the right questions to actually challenge current practice)
 
Many Thanks
 
 
David
Back to Top
Admin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1915
Post Options Post Options   Quote Admin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Aug 2008 at 9:56pm

I recall a past FAC Conference where Prof. Keith Porter (trauma specialist) talked about tourniquets. He said If I recall) that they often keep them on for more than an hour.

Back to Top
PHECTA View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1254
Post Options Post Options   Quote PHECTA Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Aug 2008 at 11:48pm
Dave
 
Thats right
 
so why when ambulance staff dont do anything more than release and transport to definitive care are first aiders told leave the person trapped and in pain so that an ambulance crew can release them say 30 minutes down the line (sometimes longer).
 
this clearly needs challenging
 
david
Back to Top
Chris B View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 22
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chris B Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Aug 2008 at 2:14am
I believe that, as Dave has suggested, its to do with the toxin release.  In the far reaches of my mind i can remember somewhere that the toxin release can lead to hypotensive crisis which may in turn lead to cardiac arrest.  Even a simple saline IV line can give some circulatory support.  Haartmans solution is better for this as i believe that it can neutrelise some acidosis, though iam prepared to stand corrected.  Maybe a First Aider could use the Capilary Refil test to determine the extent of lack circulation to the extremity, however, how many would have the confidence and experience to make such a call. 
 
S'cuse the ramblings tonight.  I'll probably wake up in the morning and realise i was wrong as usual
 
Cheers
Back to Top
AmberLight View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 382
Post Options Post Options   Quote AmberLight Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Aug 2008 at 6:52am
Risk of releasing a crush injury after period of time,
Build up of waste product / toxin in blood distal to crush site - release of same en masse into circulatory system-overload of renal function - Rabdomylosis - renal failure-cardiac arrest - collapse - death.
Similar to suspension trauma protocol of not keeping flat to prevent circulatory return too quickly.
 


Edited by AmberLight - 23 Aug 2008 at 10:53am
Kev
Amberlight Safety Ltd
www.amberlightsafety.co.uk
Back to Top
Admin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1915
Post Options Post Options   Quote Admin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Aug 2008 at 9:42am
suspension trauma protocol - you should keep sitting not flat.
Back to Top
AmberLight View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 382
Post Options Post Options   Quote AmberLight Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Aug 2008 at 10:53am
Quite right Dave, cheersSmile I have inserted the "not" that was required in the line that I missed! It was early in the morning ;-)

Edited by AmberLight - 23 Aug 2008 at 10:54am
Kev
Amberlight Safety Ltd
www.amberlightsafety.co.uk
Back to Top
DontForget2Pull View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 752
Post Options Post Options   Quote DontForget2Pull Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Aug 2008 at 12:41pm
From the missing part of the forum:



PHECTA
 
    Posted: 21 Aug 2008 at 5:58pm
Well here is a good one for debate

Why is there such a short time period on when first aiders should or should not release a person crushed by a heavy weight??

This is one for the pre-hospital practitioners to ponder over, as often, there is very little difference in the first aid and ambulance aid treatment the victim will receive, and often ambulance staff will seek rapid extraction of the casualty where life threatening injuries are presenting.

Although the treatment may differ in a hospital environment, rarely does the treatment differ from a person trapped and crushed for 30 minutes as oppose to 5 minutes.

so learned friends lets open  this debate and see if we can either support current practice or challenge current practice

i leave this open for rational sound debate

David



DontForget2Pull
 Posted: 21 Aug 2008 at 6:11pm
I would say after the time period given; between lifting the weight and advanced care arriving the casualty may be poisoned due to his/her injuries. First aider are not equiped and trained to deal with the situation.



DontForget2Pull
 Posted: 21 Aug 2008 at 6:27pm
David what 's the treatment for the potential poisoning due to an RTC, lets say victims legs crushed. Paramedics on site.

Thanks

DontForget2Pull
 
 Posted: 21 Aug 2008 at 6:55pm
A little research on the internet, I ve found out Sepsis(Bloodpoisoning) treated with antibiotics.



chris.rigby.69
 Posted: 21 Aug 2008 at 7:05pm
As I understand it, if the crush injury occludes blood vessels, toxins are built up in the trapped blood (presumably a mixture of waste products from the cells and byproducts from anaerobic respiration). If these are returned to circulation too quickly, they can kill. First Aiders (of which I am one) don't have the knowledge of this, or how to avoid it, so are taught to let the professionals deal with it




PHECTA
 Posted: 21 Aug 2008 at 9:04pm
Gentlemen thats why ive posed this conundrum

As we do not use tourniquets in the ambulance service (This was the old method for preventing toxins moving through the cardiovascular system and throughout the body in olden days) i was wondering what magical tools the boffins conclude that us mere paramedics may use as opose to the first aider to prevent toxin saturation?

We seem to be letting patients suffer under weights so that when an ambulance crew arrive (and the crew may not have a paramedic on board) to simply release the weight??

so again i ask  should we not challenge current practice??

i leave this open again for discussion

David




resq
 Posted: 21 Aug 2008 at 9:59pm


I think the issue lies with the devastating effect a large amount of lactate and potassium would have when the pressure was realeased into the circulation.

Suddenly you are faced with a situation where the electrolyte imbalance and sudden influx of potassium will cause a cardiac arrest.

I have no idea what the answer is other than a medical team on scene for prolonged entrapments/severe crush injuries.


Having never been in this situation for prolonged entrapments I am only guessing but I supose you could buffer them with bicarb and calcium prior to release but I suspect that would be very hit and miss. Peritoneal exchange with a buffered solution may support the kidneys. Not routinely carried out pre hospital.

I wonder if the removal of tourniquets from the ambulance arsenal is to ensure the call of a mobile medical team with specialist expertise and kit. 

When I get back to work I will pose the question to the trauma gods I work with and ask their opinion. I will report back.




mediaid
 Posted: 21 Aug 2008 at 11:17pm
I believe that first aiders are recommed not to remove if trapped for longer than 15 minutes is down to Shock (Hypovoleamic) which may suddenly accur following sudden release of crushing object and bllod rushing into the tissues. Parmedic's are normally recommended to insert two large canuler's before removal but if prolonger (30 minute plus) should consider Medical Team who pay satart drugs to combat the toxin (Moist-Gangrene) build up.
 
Different countries have different time scales. I believe the condition was first indentified/recorded during the First World war (Murphy 1914 (fasciotomy) ) but had been seen ealier but not understood clearly.
 
 
z
 
 


Edited by mediaid - 21 Aug 2008 at 11:19pm
Richard
Mediaid Training Services Ltd
www.mediaid.co.uk



chris.rigby.69
 Posted: Yesterday at 1:19am
I attended a talk on suspension trauma, which talked about the same thing. The effect of suspension trauma as far as I'm concerned fr this example is that of having both legs crushed at the top of the legs. The guy who gave the lecture said to in no circumstances lie them down. Whilst he recommended calling the pros, he did say that the best treatment would normally be to get them into a sitting position, allowing the toxins to gradually leave the affected tissue rather than all leaving in one rush.
 
He was also only an FA IIRC, but kind of makes sense to me


Back to Top
Admin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1915
Post Options Post Options   Quote Admin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Aug 2008 at 12:44pm

I haven’t had an update on suspension trauma for a couple of years, but the last thinking was moving away from toxins as the problem, and moving toward a surge in blood pressure causing an over inflation of the heart. This was concluded because the sudden death that can occur when placing the suspension trauma victim in the flat, horizontal position.

Strecher
Back to Top
PHECTA View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1254
Post Options Post Options   Quote PHECTA Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Aug 2008 at 1:11pm
Thanks all for the input
 
I hope this debate keeps going
 
I just want to re-focus on the entrapped casualty at scene, and not discuss what may occur in hospital in relation to drug therapy etc.
 
the basic line is that paramedics no longer use Torniquets in trauma, more and more ambulances are running without paramedics on board, on arrival at scene, an ambulance crew will release the casualty asap (remember the beeting over the heads in regional training schools on platinum 10 minutes and golden hour), so why are first aiders told to prolong the casualties agony and leave them trapped if they have been there for over 15 minutes, when the ambulance and fire service will release asap and often not use other interventions
 
again i ask for reasoned debate on why a first aider cant release a casualty when an ambulance technician or paramedic would do so asap
 
david
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 7>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.414 seconds.