CHAPTER 5 - FIRST AID TRAINING APPROVAL
ARRANGEMENTS
The Legal Requirements
1.
The research specification
did not include an assessment of the current arrangements where HSE gives
approval to training providers. Nevertheless this is an important issue that
should be considered in parallel with the other training issues in this Discussion
Document.
2.
The current training
arrangements require that first-aiders hold a valid certificate of competence
in first aid at work, issued by an organisation whose training and qualifications
are approved by HSE. This is to meet the requirements of Regulation 3 of
FAW that a person is not suitable as a first-aider unless “he has undergone
such training and has such qualifications as the Health and Safety Executive
may approve for the time being….”.
3.
HSE has interpreted
this requirement as requiring approval of the providers of training courses
in first aid at work. This system is administered through a special unit within HSE, the First Aid Approvals and Monitoring Section
(FAAMS), working with HSE’s external contractor, the Training Approval Services
Consortium (TASC). There are currently around 1500 approved training organisations,
with new applications running at 8-12 per month. HSE has charged training
providers for the administrative costs of approvals since October 2000.
4.
A specific consequence
of this interpretation is that trained first-aiders from Northern Ireland,
and from other EU states, including the Republic of Ireland, are prevented
from practising in Great Britain. At present, if such trained individuals
wish to become first-aiders in Great Britain they are required to re-train.
This can have the effect of placing a burden on both the employer and the
employee.
5.
The current arrangements
for first aid training approvals have been in place for a number of years.
Administrative approval and monitoring arrangements of training providers
are in place to ensure there is consistency of standards across the country.
However, HSE considers that other methods of meeting its obligations under
the Regulations may be more appropriate and would like to explore these other
options. Moreover, within the current approval and monitoring system the
area of work that results in the largest amount of enquiries relate to qualifications
and experience required to be a trainer or an assessor. The current approvals
system is described in Annex 4.
Qualification Standards for Trainers and
Assessors
6.
The approval and
monitoring of training organisations involves a check, covering the previous
three years, of the qualifications of the trainers and assessors they use.
The checks cover both training and assessing skills, and first aid skills
and competencies. These checks are needed because of the wide variety of backgrounds
of those who become first aid trainers and assessors. It is also because the
range of qualifications accepted is broad. HSE would like to see the introduction
of a nationally agreed qualification for both trainers and assessors, and
the names of qualified people to be held on a national register. This would
enable training providers to recruite trainers or assessors from the register
knowing that they fulfill the necessary qualifications and experience criteria.
Options for a First Aid Training Approvals
System
7.
Outlined below are
some specific options on which HSE would like to receive your comments. In
Chapter 4 you were asked to consider alternative options for approved first
aid training courses. The impact of any changes in the approvals process on
first aid courses or vice versa would of course be carefully considered as
part of any change process.
8.
Whichever option
for a first aid training approval system is finally agreed upon, the arrangements
will need to continue to deliver the required assurance that appropriate first
aid training is being delivered. Also, if a need is identified for more detailed
guidance for training providers, then HSE will consult with the first aid
training industry on how this can be met.
Option 1 HSE approves training providers
9.
This option is to
continue with the present system of HSE approving training providers as operated
by FAAMS and including the use of an appointed external contractor who conducts
monitoring visits on behalf of HSE.
10.
Although this system
has been in use for some years, HSE has concerns that the administration of
a database of training providers is not consistent with our core business.
The system is burdened with an increasing administrative workload which includes
monitoring of training providers, re-issuing of certificates (where a change
of name or address has occurred), updating the electronic record system and
also dealing with complaints as both arbiter and enforcer. HSE does not favour
this option and would like to use this opportunity to explore alternative
approaches which are more in line with modern training practices.
Option 2 HSE approves structure and
syllabus of training
11.
We have explained
that HSE has interpreted Regulation 3(2) of FAW as requiring HSE approval
of the providers of training courses. It is equally valid under the Regulation
for HSE to approve instead the structure and syllabus of first aid training
courses rather than the training providers themselves. Proceeding with this
option would therefore require the introduction of a new monitoring system
to ensure that standards of training were maintained.
12.
Such a monitoring
system would not be administered by HSE but by an independent monitoring body
which could, for instance, be appointed from within the first aid training
industry itself. This option would require external accreditation of the system
as a whole, conducted by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) or
similar organisation. If this option were to be pursued, employers could themselves
determine whether an individual trained within the EU was adequately trained
to meet the requirements of the Regulations as described by HSE.
Option 3 No approval system. This is a longer-term option, as
it would require amendment of the Regulations
13.
Under FAW employers
have a duty to provide appropriate first aid equipment and facilities to give
first aid to their employees as required. It is their responsibility to ensure
that their first-aiders are adequately trained. If the current approvals system
was withdrawn HSE would continue to provide guidance about the requirements
of FAW but would not be concerned directly with the content, quality and consistency
of training courses or providers. This would be consistent with HSE practice
in most other areas of health and safety; that is HSE provides guidance on
how to meet duties under regulations but is not itself responsible for any
approvals system helping employers to meet those duties. If this option were
pursued, employers could themselves determine whether an individual trained
within the EU was adequately trained to meet the requirements of the Regulations
as described by HSE.
14.
If Option 3 were
taken forward the proposals for training courses in Chapter 4 would not be
pursued.
15.
Whichever option
for the first aid approval system is finally agreed upon, there are three
features that will have to be included:
·
Any new arrangements
will need to continue to deliver the required assurance that appropriate first
aid training is being delivered.
·
HSE will consult
the first aid training industry if a need is identified for more detailed
guidance for training providers.
·
There should be
a nationally agreed qualification for both trainers and assessors, and details
of those qualified should be held on a register.
Questions
Q11. We would welcome your views on the advantages and
disadvantages of the options outlined above, in particular whether the first
aid training industry could regulate itself as outlined in option 2 and ensure
training is delivered with consistency and to the required standards. We
would also welcome suggestions for other options that could be considered.
Q12. Do you see a benefit in setting up a nationally
agreed qualification/register for first aid at work trainers and assessors?
Q13. If you are a training provider, do you think the
guidance given by HSE needs to be expanded - particularly if HSE’s involvement
is reduced?
Next Chapter here
Contents here